skip to Main Content

Wedding Photography Post Processing Trends

photograph of bride and groom walking through a corn field in bristol

I got in to an interesting discussion with a prospective client about post processing trends the other day. We were having a wedding consultation and he commented that he liked the ‘cleanness’ of my photographs (thanks!) in contrast to some of the other local Bristol photographers he has met. I asked him what he meant by this just as a talking point to make sure I understood his meaning and to get some feedback. He responded that the last photographer’s images were very grainy.

He put this down to the photographer’s camera ability which is an astute assessment but it made me laugh because I have noticed a lot of photographers, not necessarily in Bristol but world wide adding Photoshop grain to their images in an attempt to give them a film like quality. Personally I think this can look really good when done well. I have experimented with it because I like this effect but I don’t think it is for me. I see a lot of this and when it isn’t done subtly looks BAD (like most post processing.) The effect seems artistic and gives the photograph a feel and quality that you don’t often see in today’s digital age.
This got me thinking about post processing techniques, when to use them and why. It’s that compromise that exists in photography. Do you risk being creative and original with the knowledge that this may effect sales? Or do you shoot and process images to make them sell?

Grain is just one example. Textures, 70’s polaroid colours, selective colouring, vintage effects and HDR are other examples I have seen which seem to go through phases of popularity.
I like to think I try and fit in the middle. Where the photograph needs a little something to make it come alive I will use a certain post processing technique. But I try and shoot in camera with my own style tailored towards what I have discussed with the bride and groom. I think it’s good to be creative and do your own thing whether that’s in camera or post processing (as long as it’s doesn’t involve selective colouring!)

Please leave a comment below.


This Post Has 4 Comments

  1. Hi Albert. I read this post and I agree with you 100% I’ve been trying grain out, and only like it when it is a real warm, gentle, subtle, grain. Some recent stuff I’ve seen is down right choppy from the grain.

    The other new trend I’ve been noticing is flat grey BW conversions. What do you think about these. I was taught in photography school to have a true white, and a true white in my photos for ultimate depth of tones.


  2. I totally agree. I guess it comes down to style but I personally prefer that wider tonal range. Thanks for posting!

  3. “Do you risk being creative and original with the knowledge that this may effect sales? Or do you shoot and process images to make them sell?”

    I think that any choices one makes with regards to image post-processing is likely to affect sales, though not necessarily in an upwards and downwards manner, but often-times in a sidewards manner. Certainly there will be some more commonly digestible and popular styles than others, but with 52 weekends in a year there are plenty of clients around to fulfil enough demand for more niche markets.

    Thought provoking read Albert! Thanks for sharing.

  4. I recall having a conversation with you some time ago on this very topic… I have always been impressed with an element of your photography and I have had trouble defining what that element was. The closest I could come to describing it was that your images were “clean”. I wish I knew how you did it. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top